Click on the plot to see how stress and rock strength affect ground conditions.
A Simplified Model: This chart is based on large-scale empirical data and involves significant assumptions. It should be used for conceptual understanding only. Real-world ground behaviour is complex, and slight changes in rockmass conditions can significantly impact the outcome.
The current conditions fall outside defined failure zones.
Stress: 20 MPa
Strength: 50 MPa
A rockburst is a sudden, violent failure of rock in a high-stress environment. It is an energy-driven phenomenon where accumulated elastic strain energy is released explosively. This requires a rock mass that is both strong enough to store immense energy and brittle enough to fail suddenly without significant prior deformation. The Rock Mass Strength (horizontal axis) is typically high, reflecting competent, massive rock with a high UCS.
Kaiser, P. K., & Cai, M. (2012). Design of rock support in burst-prone ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 28, 5-18.
Salamon, M. D. G. (1984). Energy considerations in rock mechanics: fundamental results. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 84(8), 233-246.
Heal, D., Hudyma, M., & Potvin, Y. (2006). A practical application of the Russenes criterion for strainbursting in underground mines. In Proceedings of the 41st US Rock Mechanics Symposium (USRMS), Golden, Colorado.
Squeezing ground is characterized by large, time-dependent deformation occurring when induced stresses significantly exceed the rock mass strength. It is a ductile, creep-like failure common in weak rock masses (e.g., schists, phyllites, fault gouge). Unlike brittle failures, squeezing involves a slow, viscoplastic flow of material into the excavation, which can continue for long periods and exert immense pressure on support systems.
Hoek, E., & Marinos, P. (2000). Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses. Tunnels and Tunnelling International, 32(11), 45-51.
Singh, B., Jethwa, J. L., Dube, A. K., & Singh, B. (1992). Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 7(1), 59-74.
Barla, G. (1995). Tunnelling in squeezing rock. Geotechnique, 45(3), 559-570.
This failure mode is dominant in low-stress environments where gravity is the main driver. It occurs when the rock mass is divided into blocks by discontinuities (joints, faults). Failure happens when a "key block" is free to fall or slide under its own weight. The Rock Mass Strength (horizontal axis) represents the overall strength of the jointed rock, which is derived from the Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) of the intact rock but is significantly reduced by these discontinuities.
Goodman, R. E., & Shi, G. H. (1985). Block theory and its application to rock engineering. Prentice-Hall.
Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C., & Corkum, B. (2002). Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proceedings of the 5th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium (NARMS-TAC), 267-273.
Wyllie, D. C., & Mah, C. W. (2017). Rock slope engineering, civil and mining (5th ed.). CRC Press.
Intact rock represents the theoretical baseline in rock mechanics: a solid, homogeneous, isotropic continuum free of significant discontinuities. Its properties are the upper-bound benchmark for strength and stiffness. The behavior of any real-world rock mass is predicted by systematically reducing these "perfect" properties to account for joints and fractures.
ASTM D7012. (2014). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens. ASTM International.
Jaeger, J. C., Cook, N. G. W., & Zimmerman, R. W. (2007). Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics (4th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Hoek, E. (1983). Strength of jointed rock masses. Geotechnique, 33(3), 187-223.
This region represents conditions that do not fall neatly into one of the primary failure mechanisms. The ground behaviour could be transitional or influenced by a complex interplay of factors not captured by this simplified chart. A detailed site-specific analysis, including geological mapping and numerical modeling, is required to properly assess the ground conditions.